Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Model Lead Based Paint Risk Assessor Practice Test

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the EPA Model Lead Based Paint Risk Assessor Test with multiple choice questions and flashcards. Each question includes hints and explanations to help you excel in your exam!

Practice this question and more.


Would a wall typically be considered a friction surface when assessing lead hazards?

  1. Yes

  2. No

  3. Only if it is painted

  4. Only if there is visible wear

The correct answer is: No

When assessing lead hazards, a wall is generally not considered a friction surface because friction surfaces are typically areas where two surfaces come into repetitive contact that could generate lead dust or chips from lead-based paint due to wear. Common examples of friction surfaces include windows, doors, and other moving parts that experience frequent contact. In the context of a wall, it does not usually experience the same type of repeated mechanical wear or contact as surfaces like windows or door frames would. Although a wall can have lead-based paint, unless it is being actively scraped or abraded through wear and tear, it is not classified as a friction surface. Thus, the reasoning behind the response is consistent with the definitions and characteristics of surfaces deemed at risk for lead exposure.